Drift vs Jupiter Perps (2026): Velocity's Relaunch or Solana's Biggest Perps Pool?

By SolBotRank editorial team · Updated · 5 min read · How we rank

Reader-supported: we may earn a commission from links on this page. How we make money

Overall winnerBest overall

Jupiter Perps

jup.ag · #1 perps exchange in our ranking

7.9/10

No Trustpilot reviews yet

Solana's largest perps pool, up to 250x on SOL, ETH, BTC

Visit Jupiter Perps
#4 perps exchange in our ranking

Velocity (formerly Drift)

velocity.exchange · #4 perps exchange in our ranking

5.3/10

No Trustpilot reviews yet

Drift's USDT-margined relaunch after the April 2026 hack

Visit Velocity (formerly Drift)

Feature by feature

FeatureJupiter PerpsVelocity (formerly Drift)
Overall score7.9/10Winner5.3/10
Editorial score7.9Winner5.3
Price0.06% open/close + price impact + hourly borrow fee0.06% taker (to 0.02% by volume); 0.0025% maker rebate
CustodyNon-custodial, on-chainNon-custodial, on-chain
Markets3 main + 6 Beta (incl. stock perps)5 (BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE, ZEC)
CollateralLongs in the asset, shorts in USDCUSDT; SOL and others at lower weights
Trading fee0.06% open/close + borrow fee0.06% taker / 0.0025% maker rebate
Max leverage250x (SOL, ETH, wBTC); 20x Beta markets20x (BTC, ETH, SOL); 10x HYPE, ZEC
Liquidity modelJLP pool at oracle pricesJIT auctions, keeper order book, vAMM
Best forSimple SOL, ETH and BTC leverageFormer Drift users and DFX holders
Sign upVisit Jupiter PerpsVisit Velocity (formerly Drift)

Jupiter Perps

  • Pro: Largest Solana perps pool by TVL (about $731M on DefiLlama, October 2026)
  • Pro: Every fee and the liquidation formula are published in its docs
  • Pro: Trade at oracle prices with no order book to read
  • Pro: New Beta order-book markets for JUP, HYPE, ZEC and stock perps at 20x
  • Con: Only three main markets (SOL, ETH, wBTC)
  • Con: Liquidation takes all remaining collateral on JLP markets
  • Con: Hourly borrow fee pulls your liquidation price closer over time

Velocity (formerly Drift)

  • Pro: Cross-margin with lending: deposits back every position
  • Pro: Maker rebate and documented, tiered taker fees
  • Pro: Post-fork OtterSec audit; all High findings fixed per its docs
  • Pro: Detailed liquidation docs with a worked example
  • Con: April 1, 2026 exploit drained about $285M from Drift
  • Con: Very low activity: about $2.2M of 30-day volume on DefiLlama
  • Con: Only 5 perp markets, max 20x

Jupiter Perps is the better pick in 2026 for nearly every trader: it has the deepest pool on Solana, a clean record and far more liquidity. Drift, now relaunched as Velocity after a roughly $285 million exploit on April 1, 2026, has lower costs for limit-order traders and gentler partial liquidations, but almost no volume. Jupiter Perps scores 7.9/10 and Velocity 5.3/10 in our method.

Risk notice: Crypto trading is high risk and leverage can liquidate your whole position in minutes. Perps DEXs and wallet connections use hot wallets. This page is not financial advice; only trade what you can afford to lose.

Facts on this page were checked October 23, 2026, from Jupiter's and Velocity's own docs and the sources linked below. This is a research-based comparison built from published docs, not a hands-on trial.

Quick verdict

  • Pick Jupiter Perps for simple SOL, ETH or BTC leverage against a $731M pool at oracle prices, plus new Beta markets for HYPE, ZEC and stock perps. Visit Jupiter Perps
  • Pick Velocity (Drift) only if you are a former Drift user who wants to stay with the platform, or you place limit orders and value the maker rebate and partial liquidations, at small size.

Side by side

Jupiter PerpsVelocity (ex-Drift)
Our score7.9/105.3/10
ModelJLP pool at oracle pricesJIT auctions, keeper order book, vAMM backstop
Max leverage250x (SOL, ETH, wBTC); 20x Beta20x (BTC, ETH, SOL); 10x HYPE, ZEC
Markets3 main + 6 Beta5
Taker fee0.06% open and close + price impact0.06% (to 0.02% by volume)
Maker feeNot applicable on main markets; 0.005% Beta0.0025% rebate
Holding costHourly borrow feeFunding rate
CollateralLongs in the asset, shorts in USDCUSDT; SOL and others at lower weights (cross-margin)
LiquidationAll remaining collateral takenPartial, to a 2% buffer
TVL$731.04MNot shown on DefiLlama
30-day volume$4.63B$2.21M
Security recordNo perps exploit foundAbout $285M drained April 1, 2026

Sources: Jupiter docs, fees and liquidation; Velocity fees, liquidations and markets; usage from DefiLlama for Jupiter Perps and Velocity. Velocity's liquidity model is from an independent review.

What happened to Drift

Drift was drained on April 1, 2026 after an attacker used pre-signed durable-nonce transactions to take over its 2-of-5 admin multisig, which had a zero timelock, then whitelisted a fake token as collateral and withdrew real assets (Chainalysis). Drift said Mandiant attributed the attack to North Korean group UNC6862 (Drift).

Tether and partners proposed up to $147.5 million in support, and the exchange switched its settlement asset from USDC to USDT (CoinDesk). It restarted as Velocity at the end of September after OtterSec and Asymmetric Research audits (ChainCatcher). Victims hold DFX recovery tokens, and an October report said the recovery pool covered about 1% of claims (KuCoin News).

Jupiter said its JLP pool stayed fully backed and that it was not involved in Drift markets (Phemex News).

Fees

On a market order, both charge 0.06% at the base tier. The differences (our arithmetic, $10,000 position):

  • Round trip: $12 on either. Jupiter can add a price-impact fee on large orders; Velocity's taker rate drops to 0.05% above $5M of monthly volume.
  • Holding cost: Jupiter charges an hourly borrow fee. Its docs' illustrative 0.0016% an hour works out to about $3.84 a day on $10,000. Velocity uses funding, which can be paid or received depending on the side and market.
  • Limit orders: Velocity pays makers a 0.0025% rebate. Jupiter's main markets have no maker side at all; only its Beta order-book markets do, at 0.005%.

For a cheaper order book with real liquidity, Pacifica (0.040% taker) and Phoenix (0.035%) undercut both; see best Solana perps DEX.

Leverage and liquidation

This is where the two differ most.

Jupiter allows 250x on SOL, ETH and wBTC, and its maintenance margin is set from a 500x protocol limit. A fresh 250x position sits roughly 0.2% from liquidation before the close fee (our arithmetic). When it hits, all remaining collateral is taken: Jupiter's own example returns $0.

Velocity caps leverage at 20x and liquidates partially. Its docs walk through a 10x SOL long that is liquidated after a 7.22% drop: open orders are cancelled, 57% of the position is closed, and the account keeps the rest of its position and about $1,983 of collateral.

So Velocity's rules are kinder once you are underwater, and Jupiter's maximum leverage is far riskier. Either way, a stop-loss placed well before your liquidation price matters more than which venue you pick. During spikes, orders and stops can land late; see Solana priority fees and slippage and Solana MEV protection explained.

Safety and trust

Jupiter: largest pool on Solana, three oracle sources (Chaos Labs Edge primary, Chainlink and Pyth as fallback), fully published fee and liquidation formulas, and no exploit of the perps program that we found. Main risks are oracle failure and your own leverage.

Velocity: a post-fork OtterSec audit with 41 High findings, all fixed per its audits page, and a tiered key system where routine changes are timelocked. But its admin-keys page says root "cold" changes, such as replacing a market's oracle, are not timelocked, and it doesn't publish key custody. That's the same category of control the attacker abused in April.

Liquidity

Velocity's $95,213 of open interest and $2.21M of 30-day volume on DefiLlama compare with Jupiter's $47.42M and $4.63B. Thin liquidity means wider spreads, less reliable fills and messier liquidations in a fast market. Jupiter's pool model avoids order-book depth problems altogether up to its price-impact thresholds.

Other options

If you want perps alongside memecoin trading, Axiom has a Perpetuals tab that trades on Hyperliquid at up to 50x (DefiLlama), not on Solana. For spot apps, see best Solana trading app. Perps profits and losses are taxable in most countries; see Solana memecoin taxes.

Bottom line

Choose Jupiter Perps unless you have a specific reason to back Drift's recovery. Velocity's docs and liquidation rules are good, but a fresh deployment with five markets and $2 million of monthly volume can't match Jupiter's depth or record yet. Visit Velocity

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Drift or Jupiter Perps better?

Jupiter Perps, for most traders. It has about $731 million of TVL and $4.63 billion of 30-day volume on DefiLlama, against about $2.2 million of volume on Drift's relaunched exchange, Velocity.

Which is cheaper, Drift or Jupiter Perps?

Velocity, the relaunched Drift, charges 0.06% taker and pays makers a 0.0025% rebate, with no borrow fee. Jupiter charges 0.06% to open and to close plus an hourly borrow fee on its main markets.

Which has higher leverage?

Jupiter Perps, at up to 250x on SOL, ETH and wBTC. Velocity caps BTC, ETH and SOL at 20x and HYPE and ZEC at 10x.

Was Jupiter affected by the Drift hack?

Jupiter said its JLP pool remained fully backed and that it was not involved in Drift markets after the April 1, 2026 exploit.

Related on SolBotRank